Here's a quote from the article at the link down below:

"The second example has to be Neil Cavuto, who has come back on Fox News after being very, very ill. We know he has physical problems, both a history of cancer and ongoing MS. We also have been told he had COVID before getting “fully” vaccinated. Recently he disappeared for a good number of weeks, returning to talk about how his latest bout with “COVID pneumonia” could have been even worse (it nearly killed him) if he “hadn’t taken the vaccine.” Is that a valid conclusion?

He already had immunity before he took the shots. Wouldn’t it be wise to consider that vaccinating after having COVID could have compromised his immune system instead of helping it? Compromised it sufficiently that he would get very sick with this mysterious and alarming (have you heard of it before?) “COVID pneumonia.” Isn’t it possible, that if he hadn’t had the vaccine he didn’t need because he already had COVID, he might not have gotten this pneumonia at all? How can he (or anyone else) conclude that the shots were good for him? Where’s the proof?"

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/02/the_covid_narrative_continues_regardless_of_facts.html

Yeah, never mind the facts, just follow the POLITICAL narrative.  This is NOT about medicine anymore, this is and always has been a POLITICAL game/move.

Checkmate.