. . .  illegal immigrant children go to the front because their parents did something wrong. That is the sum and substance of it. Your parents brought you here illegally, and we are going to reward you for it.
. . .  would we say to the child of a convicted felon, since your parent committed a terrible crime, we are going to give you advantages which you would otherwise not have? What about the child of the parent who worked hard and obeyed the law all his life? The logical conclusion to this thinking is that the child of a law-abiding American is not worthy of special treatment, but the child of a parent who broke the law is. Viewed from this perspective, DACA fails the tests of both logic and morality.

Yes sir, that's what happened.  But those of us who aren't supporting this idea aren't supposed to argue with it or disapprove.  For heaven's sake, don't publically disapprove . . .  keep the peace, man, don't speak your mind or have an opinion of your own.  You are ONLY allowed to parrot what's being said in the mainstream. 

What a bunch of hooey.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/09/lawlessness_is_not_compassion.html