She can only do what she's told to do and say what she's told to say, but really, she thinks people should have their guns taken away?  What sense does that make to a THINKING person? 

That way only the criminals will have guns, right?  Because you can bet they will have them, no matter what the LAWS say.  The people ranting about having guns taken away from private citizens are NOT thinking clearly. If we have our guns taken away from us, then all these upper crust blow hards should not be allowed to have armed, private security details, either.  No matter who pays for them, that's not the point.  If THEY can have protection, so can we.  Most of us cannot afford private security so we have guns - affordable, effective guns used only for protection purposes. 

https://www.westernjournal.com/not-fit-job-reporter-torches-kjp-press-sec-fails-answer-questions/?seyid=45042

Most of us only know what the top of her head looks like because she's always looking down at her notes, rather than preparing herself ahead of time.  Does she NOT go to any of the "classified meetings" where these things are discussed??  Guess not.  But I'll bet she takes home good pay for her "non-job".