Offline
Oh yeah, it's waaaaaaay more than a cover up con by the majority of the media. It's outrightly not focusing on the ACTUAL NEWS ITSELF. I guess they think by denying it, it will somehow magically go away . . . but just because you ignore something doesn't mean it isn't there. I think the bidens are gonna have a helluva time gettin' outta this one. In fact, I don't think it's possible to "get out of it" and they deserve whatever backlash they get. 47 years of ol' gropey Joe is enough I think, don't you?!!
"In the week after the New York Post published its damaging report on Hunter Biden, the New York Times has run a grand total of five news stories on the topic.
The first report started this way: “The Biden campaign on Wednesday rejected a New York Post report about Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son Hunter that the nation’s leading social media companies deemed so dubious that they limited access to the article on their platforms.”
Two of the other stories focused on the social media angle. Another hinted that the scandal was part of a Russian disinformation campaign. The fifth was about how some reporters at the New York Post had “questioned the credibility” of the story.
Whatever you think of the New York Post or Donald Trump or Joe Biden, this story is what we in the news business call “news.” Yet the rest of the mainstream press handled it almost exactly as the Times did – as an inconvenience."